Introduction

I am a lover of film! On this blog you will find all manner of things relating to film. For more information, click the on the information tab above this message. Thankyou!

FilmDebate

Wednesday 20 July 2011

[Review] Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows Part Two - 20th July 2011


 - Average [For rating system, see information tab at top of blog]

-

Release Date: 15th July 2011
-
Director: David Yates
-
Writers: Steve Kloves (Screenplay) - J.K. Rowling (Novel)
-
Cast: Daniel Radcliffe - Emma Watson - Rupert Grint - Maggie Smith - Ralph Fiennes - Alan Rickman - Michael Gambon



Review

‘Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows Part 2’ is arguably the most anticipated film ever made. The eight-part franchise has already become the highest grossing film saga, currently touching $5.5 billion in worldwide profit – the final part alone has broken two records, the midnight viewing, reaching $43.5 million, and the first day viewing, reaching $92.1 million. But was the final installment worth the wait?

The film is not perfect, but it is entertaining nonetheless. Along with hundreds of thousands of other Harry Potter fans, I impatiently awaited this last installment. The final book was just as enjoyable to read as its predecessors, and due to the anticipation created in the run up to its release, the film had an incredible standard to meet.

When you look at ‘Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows Part 2’ as the final episode in the saga, it is a good film. It flows very naturally, answers all the consumers unanswered questions and keeps itself very true to the final chapters in the book – for a film with such a high expectation, it is very well made and perfect in drawing the Harry Potter saga to a close.

In parts the film is moving, though this was always to be expected as many consider it to be the end of an ‘era’. In terms of direction and writing, the film is adequate. The manner in which the film flows and is constructed is very concise, mystical and impressionistic – perfect for solving the previously inspired mysteries.   

The first problem with the film stems from performances. While the performances from supporting actors and actresses like Ralph Fiennes, Alan Rickman and Helena Bonham Carter are excellent, I would, however, take issue with those coming from the leading three roles – Harry, Ron and Hermione. While the three (Emma Watson, Rupert Grint and Daniel Radcliffe) perform acceptably in scenes involving action, pace and panic, they do not always bring the required amount of sincerity to the more emotional ones. However, this does not predominate, as in contrast to the previous installments,  ‘Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows Part 2’ is very action based, so the acting flaws are not as exposed.

A second problem I have with the film is in relation to special effects. The film has some scenes that do not seem to have had the same effort employed as that given to others. The battle of Hogwarts for example, a very famous chapter in the book, is well depicted - the effects are believable and exciting. However, other scenes throughout the film that require CGI and various effects are of a lower standard – for example, a scene in which Harry, Ron and Hermione are flying brooms through a burning room is very poorly constructed and lacks the standard of realism that is expected from todays productions.

Though there was nothing hugely wrong with ‘Harry Potter & The Deathly hallows Part 2’, I expected something more. In terms of aesthetics, the film had small issues throughout that dragged it down. Having said this, it was a film that I enjoyed purely because I am a Harry Potter fan, the final chapters of ‘The Deathly hallows’ where my favorite throughout the entire series, therefore it was exciting to see it come to life. 

Saturday 16 July 2011

[Review] Transformers 3: Dark Of The Moon - 16th July 2011


 - Leaves A Lot To Be Desired [For rating system, see information tab at top of blog]

-

Release Date: 29th June 2011
-
Director: Michael Bay
-
Writers: Ehren Kruger
-
Cast: Shia LaBeouf - Rosie Huntington-Whiteley - Tyrese Gibson - Josh Duhamel - John Turturro 




Review

Ultimately I feel there is little that can be said about ‘Transformers 3: Dark Of The Moon’. The film is a classic example of something that has sacrificed all substance, purely for style.

The film is totally overpowered by special effects, and it has to be said, they are spectacular. In some ways, this makes discussion of the negative aspects of the film not worth mentioning. Not because they are little problems, but because in a strange way you don’t notice them.

‘Avatar’ set the standard for special effects in 2009, and since its release I have not seen a film that has matched its class in terms of visuals on a large scale – Until ‘Transformers 3: Dark Of The Moon’. The action sequences throughout the film are exceptional; the near perfect CGI combined with effective use of slow motion, editing and phenomenal sound mixing creates scenes that grip you and leave you mesmerized.

Having said that: while the effects, both visual and sound, are of the highest quality, everything else in the film ranks as average to poor. Performances, narrative and writing all seem to have been forgotten and cast to one side in the wake of the visual effects.

The cast displayed very mediocre individual performances, and as an ensemble attempted to create a screen chemistry that unfortunately never became believable. Shia LaBeouf maintained the same standard performance he set in the previous films. Small comical roles from John Malkovich and Ken Jeong added an element of humor to the film - however, the loss of Megan Fox for Rosie Huntington-Whiteley was the biggest problem. It seems she was casted to try and better the appearance of Megan Fox, a cardinal error, as her performance and on-screen presence lacked any impact and bordered on irritating.

The narrative of the film was also unexceptional. The writers added a clever element to the plot by turning the first ever moon landing into a type of government conspiracy, but unfortunately it did not conceal the fact that the films story was a simple ‘good versus evil’ yarn.  A new perpetrator teams up with the old perpetrator, creates a plot that would destroy the world, leaving it up to the heroes to save the human race.  A narrative that worked perfectly for the effects throughout the film, but was still predictable and weak nonetheless. 

‘Transformers 3: Dark Of The Moon’ – a very poor film in terms of substance, but exceptional in terms of effects. I would recommend going to see this at the cinema in 3D, just to be mind-numbingly dazzled. 

Sunday 10 July 2011

On Holiday

Im going on a short holiday tomorrow, will be back on saturday the 16th. All posts including the new weekly debate article will resume when I am back.

All the best,
FilmDebate

Monday 4 July 2011

Weekly Debate

This is just some information on a new article I am going to write. Each week I will choose a topical film news story and write my own opinion on the matter. I'm hopping it will start some debates. This weekly article will be called: [Weekly Debate], followed by the story's title.

Leave me some comments with your thoughts, and any other ideas you might have.

All the best,
FilmDebate